Updated 4 November 2026
Off the Plan Potential Problem #49: Developer Reputation
Explore CM Lawyers’ off-the-plan purchase services.
A polished display suite tells you little about who must deliver the finished property or respond if something goes wrong. Developer research should connect the sales brand with the legal entities, people and project records behind it. The result should inform your purchase decision and the protections you seek before exchange.
What does a developer’s reputation actually tell me?
A track record can help you assess how a developer has delivered projects and responded to problems, but reputation is not a legal guarantee. Assess verifiable conduct, comparable completed work and current financial or regulatory information. A familiar brand, award or convincing salesperson does not replace investigation of the particular project.
My practical advice is to ask for evidence behind each important claim. Separate the quality of a completed building from the company’s ability to finish this development and meet future obligations. Those questions may have different answers, even within the same corporate group.
Are the developer, vendor and builder the same person?
Often they are not. The vendor signs the sale contract, the developer arranges the project, and the builder carries out construction under a separate arrangement. Marketing may use a group name that is not any contracting entity. Identify each participant and its role before assuming responsibility rests with the brand.
Ask for the vendor’s legal name and ACN, the landowner, builder and nominated supervisor. Identify any trustee capacity. Check who makes particular promises and who must perform them; a related company’s involvement does not automatically make it liable for your contract.
How do company searches help before exchange?
Search the exact company name and ACN, then compare the result with the contract and project material. Company records can identify registration status, officers and changes that warrant further questions. They do not certify solvency or guarantee performance, and information about one company should not be attributed automatically to another.
ASIC’s company registers provide basic information and access to further records. Ask your adviser whether current and historical extracts would help trace name changes or associated entities. A newly formed project company is not inherently improper, but its support and obligations need examination.
Whose licences and registrations should I check?
Check the builder and relevant practitioners for the work they are actually engaged to perform. Match the licence or registration to the legal entity, category, current status and any conditions. Do not assume that the developer’s brand must hold every building licence, or that another group company’s licence covers the work.
Use the Service NSW builder and tradesperson check. Ask who will supervise construction and whether the named builder is formally appointed. A licence is a regulatory requirement, not an assurance that every previous or future project will be free of defects.
What should I investigate about completed developments?
Look for comparable projects completed by the relevant entities and team, rather than a list of developments associated loosely with the brand. Ask when they finished, whether significant defects emerged and how complaints were resolved. Where possible, inspect completed buildings and seek reliable information from owners or their representatives.
Separate firsthand observations from anonymous allegations. Request documents supporting claims that defects were repaired or disputes resolved, while recognising that private records may not be available. One attractive recent building may reveal little about waterproofing performance or maintenance several years after occupation.
How should I interpret regulatory orders?
Search the project address and relevant entities in Building Commission records. Read the actual order, its scope and current status rather than relying on a headline. An active prohibition or rectification order may affect completion or require work. The absence of an active entry is not proof of an unblemished history.
The building work orders register and explanation of orders distinguish different powers. Orders are published while in force. Ask what work remains, whether an order has been varied or revoked, and how that affects the specific apartment or building you intend to buy.
Does a court case prove that a developer is unreliable?
No. Litigation may involve disputed allegations, procedural applications or a successful defence. Read the decision and final orders, check the entity and consider any appeal. Repeated established problems can justify closer investigation, but a filed claim or an unfavourable online account is not itself a finding of wrongdoing.
Record what the court actually decided and what remains unresolved. Avoid treating a dispute involving a director’s unrelated business as a finding against your vendor. Ask the developer for a documented response where the proceedings concern the same project, team or recurring problem.
What does an iCIRT rating add to my checks?
An iCIRT rating is an independent assessment of a business across matters such as capability, conduct, capital and counterparties. Check the exact rated entity, role, date and current listing. It is useful evidence, but it is not a government guarantee of your apartment, an insurance policy or a substitute for contract review.
The NSW explanation of iCIRT describes its assessment and renewal process. Confirm claims through the live iCIRT register. Not every business is assessed or publicly listed, so the absence of a rating alone does not establish that a developer is dishonest or incapable.
Can I check whether the developer can afford to finish?
You can investigate warning signs, but public searches cannot guarantee that a project is fully funded or will remain solvent. Ask about construction finance, the appointed builder, project progress and support behind the vendor. Distinguish evidence of funding from a marketing statement that a development is financially secure.
Check ASIC insolvency notices and ask advisers about relevant company information. A clear search is only a snapshot. If the vendor is a project company, establish whether any proposed parent-company guarantee is actually documented, enforceable and backed by an entity with resources.
Is my deposit protected if the developer fails?
For an off-the-plan contract covered by NSW’s statutory deposit protections, money paid as a deposit or instalment must remain with the stakeholder in a trust or controlled money account during the contract period. It cannot simply be released to fund the developer’s construction. Confirm the stakeholder and payment instructions independently.
The Registrar General explains deposit protection. A bank guarantee or deposit bond has different terms from cash. Protected deposit money does not necessarily compensate you for rent, financing costs or a lost purchase opportunity, and insolvency may require advice about recovery and the contract’s status.
Do insurance and building bonds remove the need for due diligence?
No. Each scheme has eligibility rules, limits and claim requirements. Home building compensation insurance is not required for every apartment development, and a strata building bond is not comprehensive insurance against every loss. Check the protection that actually applies to the building and obtain the relevant evidence before relying on it.
SIRA explains developer-sale insurance requirements, including the exemption for new apartments over three storeys. Review applicable strata bond arrangements separately. Ask whether any additional insurance is genuinely issued and what it covers, rather than treating a brochure’s assurance as proof.
What contractual protection matters alongside the research?
The contract should be reviewed for the property promised, permitted changes, completion arrangements, termination rights and remedies. Important assurances should be recorded appropriately rather than left in sales conversations. Strong reputation evidence does not repair an unsuitable contract, and a detailed contract does not remove the risk of an insolvent counterparty.
Keep dated marketing material and written answers. Compare the disclosure statement, plans, finishes and draft by-laws. Ask for clarification where the entity making the promise differs from the vendor, or where the documents permit changes inconsistent with what attracted you to the purchase.
What if warning signs emerge after I have signed?
Send the evidence to your solicitor promptly and request a documented project update. A poor review, change of builder or financial rumour does not automatically give you a right to cancel. Assess actual breaches, formal notices, statutory protections and deadlines before withholding payment, accepting changes or purporting to terminate.
Distinguish investigation from taking legal action. The appropriate response may involve a regulator, the owners corporation, a court or NCAT where it has jurisdiction. A complaint does not necessarily suspend settlement or extend the time available to bring a claim.
What does Kazzi show about identifying responsible people?
Kazzi v KR Properties Global Pty Ltd t/as AK Properties Group [2024] NSWCA 143 shows that the company name is not the whole inquiry. The NSW Court of Appeal considered the personal statutory duty of a builder’s nominated supervisor. Responsibility depended on his involvement in the work, not merely his corporate title.
The owners engaged Oxford to construct six apartments in Gerringong. Mr Kazzi was its sole director, shareholder and nominated supervisor. The Court found that his decisions about how the work progressed and departed from approved plans breached his duty of care. It dismissed his appeal and allowed the owners’ cross-appeal, entering an increased judgment against him. This was an owners’ construction dispute, not a finding that off-the-plan buyers had failed to research reputation. Nor does it make every director personally liable for a company’s debts. The practical lesson is to identify participants and investigate their actual roles.
How can CM Lawyers help assess a developer before purchase?
CM Lawyers can examine the vendor’s identity, contract protections and relevant search results, and help identify questions requiring technical or financial advice. Bring the proposed contract, disclosure documents, sales promises and any concerns from your research. Complete this assessment before exchange, when your ability to negotiate or choose another property is strongest.
I would turn unresolved concerns into specific written questions before treating the purchase as ready to proceed. Discuss your off-the-plan purchase on 02 9557 9000, email lawyers@cmlaw.com.au, or contact CM Lawyers.
General information only, current at 4 November 2026. Obtain advice about the particular development and contract before acting.
Key resources
